![]() !(/public/ imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot at 4.38.16 PM.png) Let me know if there are any missing ones I should post. You're best to post screen shots of your floating firewall rules as well as your queue details in order to get meaningful help.Īlright so here are those screenshots. It may have set an arbitrarily low UpperLimit on the queue your TV is using. Traffic-shaping cannot give you bandwidth you don't wizard come sometimes come up with some strange values for the various HSFC variables. If your connection is screwy, traffic-shaping may not help. This may or may not solve your problem, but from a traffic-shaping perspective it's a good starting point. Create a firewall rule to assign Wirecast traffic to the qWirecast queue. Create 2 queues on WAN: qWirecast and qDefault. Is traffic shaping the route for me or do I possibly have a different problem? I assume that traffic shaping is a solution, but I haven't found anything about prioritizing streaming…only blocking/slowing it down. I've done speed tests to my heart's content and I consistently get 8/7 there during work hours. I haven't noticed a downturn in performance anywhere else on our network. The only thing that has changed is I switched our network layout to use VLANs. Now, I can't even get it to stream fine on "YouTube 720p Minimum". ![]() We used to do this perfectly fine with Wirecast's built in preference for "YouTube 1080p Recommended". We want to stream our services live on YouTube using Wirecast. Can't seem to find any information on this subject anywhere on the web, and I'm honestly frustrated with this whole ordeal.Īt my church, we have a 10/10 Mb/s pipe coming in for our internet.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |